The actor attributes the success to themselves and the observer will likely attribute it to the environment/situation. Interestingly, in a positive situation, it’s the opposite. Sounds familiar right? You’re 0-3 after 5 minutes so you start complaining in chat about the jungler never ganking (they have created a situation where you cannot succeed), he/she calls you a noob for feeding (they think you’re trash). In negative situations, actors are more likely to blame their situation/environment while observers are more likely to blame the individual. This sounds kind of obvious but give it a chance. ![]() In brief, actors (you) and observers (your teammates, coworkers, etc.) view the cause for the actor’s behavior (rampant feeding) differently. “How many times do I have to ping before my jungler ganks? This guy is so overextended.”.“Did mid call mia?” as you scroll through chat and look mid where your mid-laner is still slowly last hitting creeps instead of shoving and you start pinging enemy turret like a maniac.“If only my jungler was there, that kill was so free.”.You get tower dove, die and lose out on the massive wave that had accumulated.Īfterwards, you’re primary reaction is often probably to think: You’re trying to cs under tower as best you can but you’re out of health potions and dangerously low on health. Your lane opponent is bullying you pretty hard but has been overextended for like 3 minutes now.You teleport back to lane, only to immediately get tower-dove by mid-lane and that swine jungler who just waited in the side-brush instead of backing. ![]() ![]() You get ganked, burn flash and still die.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |